Wednesday, October 5, 2022
HomeHealthPro-Life Activist Lila Rose Battles Pro-Abortionist On Dr. Phil

Pro-Life Activist Lila Rose Battles Pro-Abortionist On Dr. Phil

Pro-life activist Lila Rose made an appearance on Dr. Phil to explain her stance… and she did not disappoint. There are a few clips from the episode that stand out. A couple of them are covered in my video about the subject. The first one is of her having a back-and-forth “discussion” with a woman in the audience.

The woman in question does not appear to be pro-life at all. If there was any such thing as the polar opposite to Lila Rose, it could be this woman. She was furious and angry at Rose’s pro-life viewpoint. Rose, on the other hand, was calm and patient with the woman. She did not raise her voice or disrespect her at all. It was a master class in debate. Then, Dr. Phil stepped up to the plate and attempted to debate Rose on facts and figures. She presented irrefutable data to Dr. Phil that he essentially dismissed as unimportant while continuing to share his particular point of view.

- Advertisement -

The episode was utterly one-sided with everyone who appeared on screen being pro-abortion with Lila Rose being the sole voice of dissent. However, she handled herself well. Comments online show that quite a few people’s minds were changed due to Rose framing the argument of abortion about protecting the lives of innocent, defenseless children.

SOURCES:

Benny Johnson on Twitter: “Pro-Life mother SHUTS DOWN abortion-obsessed lib on  LIVE TV— Everyone left STUNNED into silence https://t.co/h9xgausYoI” / Twitter

Live Action on Twitter: “[email protected] brings SCIENCE to Dr Phil: 96% of 5,577 biologists from 1,058 academic institutions affirmed that human’s life begins at fertilization “If it isn’t a human life in the womb, why do you have to kill it?” Science is crystal clear that life begins at fertilization https://t.co/fZ1YkHvS9a” / Twitter

- Advertisement -

2 COMMENTS

  1. Hey ABL, someone needs to show this to Dr. Phil because he clearly doesn’t know what he’s talking about:

    The fundamental approaches of biomedical and social practice must begin with the understanding that the subject before birth is a person and that “personhood” is conferred by successful fertilization of the egg. To hide from this in silence or ignorance should be unacceptable to all as stressed by Scarpelli. (6)

    View that human life begins when sperm and eggs fuse to give rise to a single cell human zygote whose genetic individuality and uniqueness remain unchanged during normal development is widely supported. Because the zygote has the capacity to become an adult human individual, it is thought it must be one already. The same zygote organizes itself into an embryo, a foetus, a child and an adult. By this account, the zygote is an actual human individual and not simple a potential one in much the same way as an infant is on actual human person with potential to develop to maturity and not just a potential person. As Scarpelli pointed out recently outside the realm of religious dogma, there has been no one, whose existence can be traced back to any entity other than the fertilized egg. The biological line of existence of each individual, without exception begins precisely when fertilization of the egg is successful

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245522/#!po=0.925926

  2. I’ve also got this statement from the American College of Pediatricians:

    The American College of Pediatricians concurs with the body of scientific evidence that corroborates that a unique human life starts when the sperm and egg bind to each other in a process of fusion of their respective membranes and a single hybrid cell called a zygote, or one-cell embryo, is created.

    https://archive.acpeds.org/the-college-speaks/position-statements/life-issues/when-human-life-begins

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Popular

Recent Comments